Post a role and the applications flood in, most of them polished by the same AI tools, listing the same buzzwords, impossible to tell apart. You're not short on applicants. You're short on a way to know which ones are real.
groundtruth / inbox
applicant_204.pdf
"Results-driven full-stack engineer passionate about scalable solutions..."
applicant_205.pdf
"Results-driven full-stack engineer passionate about scalable solutions..."
applicant_206.pdf
"Results-driven full-stack engineer passionate about scalable solutions..."
same phrasing, same structure, zero way to verify any of it
Groundtruth skips the resume entirely. Candidates connect GitHub, we check what they've actually built, and you see a ranked list backed by commits and deployed code, not adjectives.
step by step
Screening your candidates
01 / 05
Create your job and share the link
Set the role, the stack you need, and where candidates can be based. Groundtruth generates an apply link, post it on LinkedIn, X, or your own careers page, wherever you already reach candidates.
✓ Every claim traced to a source✓ Dead links flagged, not hidden✓ Scored per role, not once for everyone
how it works
01
We read, not guess
Repos, commit history, live projects, checked directly. Dead links get flagged, not scored as real.
02
Facts stay separate from opinions
What we found and what we think about it live in two different sections. You can always tell which is which.
03
Every line has a receipt
No claim in the report exists without a pointer to exactly where it came from.
questions
Hire on what's real
Be one of the first teams who'd rather check a candidate's work than take their word for it.